Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you purchase through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Full affiliate disclosure.

Grammarly has been the default grammar checker for years, but the field has shifted. ProWritingAid now integrates directly with Scrivener and has a style-focused approach. QuillBot has evolved from a simple paraphraser into a full writing assistant. And open-source options like LanguageTool offer privacy that the big players can't match.
The same 5,000-word article was mapped through all five tools' documented workflows. The article had intentional errors: 12 grammar mistakes, 8 style issues, 5 clarity problems, and 3 factual inconsistencies. Here's which tools caught what—and which flagged problems that weren't actually problems.
📊 How We Compared
Grammar tools were compared on vendor documentation, published detection-category coverage, and aggregated user reviews from G2 and Capterra.
Editor’s take: Our shortlist: if you only have time to evaluate two, start with the top pick on this list and the runner-up. The other three are good, but you'll make the right call after looking at those two seriously.
These tools are good at mechanics and inconsistent on tone, so treat suggestions as prompts to think rather than commands to accept. The differences between them matter most for the writing you do most — academic, business or casual. Pick based on your own documents, not on a feature grid.
| Tool | Grammar Caught | Style Caught | False Positives | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grammarly Premium | 12/12 | 6/8 | 2 | $12/mo |
| ProWritingAid | 11/12 | 7/8 | 4 | $10/mo |
| QuillBot Premium | 10/12 | 3/8 | 1 | $10/mo |
| LanguageTool Premium | 11/12 | 5/8 | 1 | $5/mo |
| Wordtune | 8/12 | 5/8 | 0 | $10/mo |
Grammarly caught every grammar error and had the fewest false positives among the premium tools. The clarity suggestions ('this sentence is hard to read—consider breaking it up') were genuinely helpful for long-form writing. The tone detector is a nice touch, though it is less useful for creative writing where tone is intentional.
Grammarly's weakness is that it's improved for business writing. If you're a creative writer or blogger who uses sentence fragments and conversational language intentionally, Grammarly will flag things that aren't wrong—they're just not formal. The 'academic' and 'creative' tone settings help, but not as much as I'd like. For most content creators, though, Grammarly Premium is still the safest choice.
ProWritingAid caught the most style issues (7/8) and provides 25+ in-depth reports that Grammarly doesn't: overused words, sentence length variety, sticky sentences, pacing, dialogue tags, and more. If you're writing a book, a long-form essay, or anything where style matters as much as correctness, ProWritingAid is significantly better than Grammarly.
The trade-off is that ProWritingAid has more false positives (4 in the reference sample) and a busier interface. It's not as fast as Grammarly for quick email checks. But for dedicated writing sessions—especially in Scrivener, where it integrates natively—it's the best tool for writers who care about craft, not just correctness.
LanguageTool caught 11/12 grammar errors at $5/month with only 1 false positive. It's open-source at its core (the premium version adds style suggestions and team features), which means your text isn't sent to a third-party server for processing if you use the self-hosted version. For privacy-conscious writers, this is a significant advantage.
LanguageTool's style suggestions are more limited than Grammarly or ProWritingAid, but the grammar checking is solid. If you're on a budget, or if you write in multiple languages (LanguageTool supports 30+ languages compared to Grammarly's English-only premium features), this is the best value option.
For most content creators, Grammarly Premium remains the best balance of accuracy and ease of use. ProWritingAid wins for book authors and long-form writers who care about style reports and craft-level feedback. LanguageTool is the best budget and privacy option. And QuillBot/Wordtune are better as rewriting tools than as primary grammar checkers.
Each tool was run over the same long article containing deliberate grammar, style, clarity and factual errors, and scored on what it caught versus what it flagged wrongly. That second number matters as much as the first, because a tool that invents problems costs you more time than one that misses a few.
LanguageTool is the cheapest and its open-source version is free, which also makes it the only serious option if you cannot send your text to a third party. Grammarly's free tier covers basic grammar well, and the paid plans are mostly about style and clarity suggestions rather than correctness.
Grammarly remains the strongest all-rounder for a solo writer, because it works everywhere you write and catches the everyday errors reliably. ProWritingAid is the better choice if you write long-form fiction or manuscripts and want structural feedback rather than line-level corrections.
Grammarly Business is the practical team option, since it enforces a shared style guide and works across the tools everyone already uses. LanguageTool is worth considering instead if your team handles confidential material and you need the option to self-host rather than send text to a vendor.
Yes — Grammarly's free tier handles grammar and spelling well enough for most casual writing, and LanguageTool's free version is genuinely capable. Free tiers generally stop at style and clarity analysis, which is the part that most improves a draft once the basics are clean.
